What was your PhD about?
My PhD examined stakeholder engagement in evidence-informed decision-making, using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) on Preterm Birth as a central case study. I explored how different stakeholders, including service users, clinicians, researchers were involved in identifying and prioritising unanswered research questions in the context of preterm birth. Through qualitative case study methods, I analysed the processes, dynamics and impacts of stakeholder involvement. The research was grounded in the principles of co-production and knowledge translation, aiming to inform more inclusive, transparent and accountable approaches to setting health research agendas.
What motivated you to do a PhD on this topic?
With experience in both policy and academic settings, I became increasingly aware of the gap between research and the needs of those most affected by health conditions. Preterm birth is a significant global health issue, yet research agendas have often been shaped without sufficient input from patients or frontline practitioners. I was inspired by the JLA’s participatory model and saw an opportunity to examine how such approaches could enhance the relevance and legitimacy of health research. The EPPI Centre’s expertise in evidence use, and its strong focus on equity and stakeholder engagement, made it the ideal place to carry out this work.
Why did you choose to do your PhD at the EPPI Centre?
The EPPI Centre is internationally recognised for its leadership in evidence-informed policy, systematic reviews and participatory methodologies. I was particularly drawn to its interdisciplinary, critical approach and its commitment to social relevance and methodological rigour. The Centre’s collaborative environment and strong international networks provided an excellent platform for exploring questions around stakeholder engagement and research impact.
What challenges did you face during your PhD, and how did you overcome them?
Conducting qualitative research involving diverse stakeholder groups presented a number of challenges, including managing expectations, navigating ethical considerations and remaining reflexive throughout. Like many PhD students, I also experienced periods of self-doubt and isolation, particularly during fieldwork. What enabled me to manage these difficulties was the excellent supervision and mentorship I received, the support of a peer network and a strong sense of commitment to the purpose of the research. Staying focused on the broader goals of the work, and keeping a sense of humour, helped me maintain perspective.
What have you been doing since completing your PhD, and how has your PhD informed this?
After completing my fieldwork, I worked in South Korea in a permanent academic role before returning to the UK. I subsequently joined the University of Southampton as a Research Fellow, focusing on health policy, evidence use and public involvement. My PhD has been central to shaping my research interests and establishing my academic career. It provided me with both theoretical grounding and practical experience, enabling me to contribute to national and international debates on research and policy.
What advice would you give to future PhD students considering study at the EPPI Centre?
Approach your PhD with curiosity, critical thinking and openness to learning. The EPPI Centre encourages deep engagement with both theory and practice, so bring your questions, ideas and lived experiences into your work. Make the most of the vibrant research community and do not hesitate to ask for guidance or support. Most importantly, see your PhD as more than a project. It is a space to develop your voice, resilience and intellectual independence.