HelpForum

Forum (Archive)

This forum is kept largely for historic reasons and for our latest changes announcements. (It was focused around the older EPPI Reviewer version 4.)

There are many informative posts and answers to common questions, but you may find our videos and other resources more informative if you are an EPPI Reviewer WEB user.

Click here to search the forum. If you do have questions or require support, please email eppisupport@ucl.ac.uk.

<< Back to main Help page

HomeHomeUsing EPPI-Revi...Using EPPI-Revi...New Feature Req...New Feature Req... Enable Enable 'copy& paste' function between different codesets
Previous
 
Next
New Post
09/02/2012 14:12
 

Would be great if there's a function which will Enable 'copy& paste' function between different codesets. For instance if there are 7 outcomes in the data extraction tool (each having separate code) and 3 types of characteristics are needed to collect on them (e.g. method or time of assessment), it would make much more sense just to create one outcome codeset and copy& paste it 6 times into the extraction tool, instead of having to create the same thing 6 times manually.

 
New Post
09/02/2012 14:38
 

Hello Jan,

Thanks for the suggestion. There are a number of codeset editing functions that we would like to add and one of them is the ability to copy sections of a codeset to a different location within a codeset and across codesets. Although I don't have a time frame of when this would be implemented it is something we want to see as well.

As for your specific example, you can add multiple outcomes to the same study. If you set your codetype to 'outcome' and then click on the outcome button while coding you can enter multiple outcomes for the same study. Then, when running a meta-analysis you can choose a particular outcome from a particular study and combine it with particular outcomes from other studies.

If your study contained multiple interventions and you wanted to enter data from each intervention then there are a couple of ways you could handle this. One way would be to have multiple outcome codesets or multiple outcome sections in a codeset  (as you suggested) to enter the data. Another way would be to have multiple versions of the same study linked to each other. There would be a 'main' version of the study and then a number of stubs; each representing a different intervention. You would only need to apply the codes relevant to the intervention for the stub studies.

Best regards,

Jeff

 
New Post
10/02/2012 16:39
 

 Hi Jeff

Thanks for your answer. Your last paragraph is most relevant to my situation, where I'm trying to extract outcome data from a study which has 3 experimental interventions (none of them is control). I'm not sure if I understand the last four sentences of your reply though. When I create a new outcome, I'm prompted to enter numerical data for both Intervention and Control group. There's no option to add an extra group here.

So probably the first of your suggested solutions is more plausible, although I need a little more explanation on how to do it for this specific study. Creating 'main' versions and 'stubs' versions of the same study may be a bit confusing for the second data extractor in case of double data extraction.

kind regs,

Jan

 
New Post
13/02/2012 20:45
 

Hello Jan,

The 'stub' suggestion was for the case where you might have a paper that is looking a number of interventions that may or may not be related. For example, if you had a paper that was looking at 3 different interventions and you needed to carry out 3 separate data extractions you could have 3 separate references in your database (one for each intervention). If the author was Smith the three references could be Smith 1, Smith 2 and Smith 3. Smith 1 would be the main reference and Smith 2 and 3 would be stubs (and most likely created after you were done screening using Smith 1). You could link Smith 1, 2 and 3 so you knew they were part of the same paper. If you are double data extracting, Smith 1, 2 and 3 would each get double data extracted. I think this would cover your scenario, if I understand it correctly.

The other option would be to have sections of your data extraction tool that are repeated for each different intervention.

Best regards,
Jeff

 
New Post
21/02/2012 14:09
 

 OK,

and if I decide to use the 'other option' - how do I enter outcomes of the interventions in each of the 'repeated' sections of the data extraction tool: do I leave the outcomes for the 'comparison' blank and only enter the outcomes of the experimental arm 3 times (in the case of 3 intervention arms)?

thanks,

jan

 
New Post
21/02/2012 14:34
 

Hello Jan,

If you are going to have repeated sections in your coding tool for each intervention you will want to have a code in each section called something like 'Outcome data' that will have the codetype Outcome.

When you are coding and you select this code your will see a button labelled 'Outcomes' next to it. When you click on that button the 'Edit outcomes' window will open. In this window you can enter multiple outcomes for that intervention (if the intervention you are coding for has multiple outcomes)

Later, if you are running a meta-analysis you can then select particular outcomes from each intervention (and each coded item) and mix them (if it is appropriate to do so).

Best regards,

Jeff

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeUsing EPPI-Revi...Using EPPI-Revi...New Feature Req...New Feature Req... Enable Enable 'copy& paste' function between different codesets


Copyright 2021 by EPPI-Centre :: Privacy Statement :: Terms Of Use :: Site Map :: Login
Home::Help::EPPI-Mapper::RIS Export::About::Account Manager