Shareable Reviews - Questions about using EPPI-Reviewer

Forum (Archive)

This forum is kept largely for historic reasons and for our latest changes announcements. (It was focused around the older EPPI Reviewer version 4.)

There are many informative posts and answers to common questions, but you may find our videos and other resources more informative if you are an EPPI Reviewer WEB user.

Click here to search the forum. If you do have questions or require support, please email eppisupport@ucl.ac.uk.

<< Back to main Help page

02/09/2011 17:41

Alison Jones

Joined: 06/02/2012

Posts: 11

Shareable Reviews

Hello,

I recently created a new folder in our account ('BCATPR Yes'), and have just realized that is is not accessible to any other reviewers. Is there a way of sharing this folder? Or, if each account is limited to two shareable reviews, is it possible to make BCATPR Yes the second shared folder and to get rid of the one called 'Test Folder'?

Thanks,

Ali

05/09/2011 12:44

Jeff Brunton

Joined: 17/10/2011

Posts: 594

Re: Shareable Reviews

Hello Ali,

Your shareable review is the review called 'BCATPR Master'. This is the one that can have mulitple users in it. Any other reviews that you create will be non-shareable unless you decide to purchase further access and make them shareable as well. The shareable review fee is £35 per month.

I noticed that you use the term 'folder' and that one of the reviews you have created is called 'BCATPR Yes'. In EPPI-Reviewer, rather than having a number of separate reviews that handle the different categories of your project, you need have all parts of your review in the same review. Within that review you can then categorise the items/studies by applying codes to those items. Applying different codes to the studies/items is like placing them in different ‘folders’ (as you describe it) as they can be queried and located based on the codes applied.

Best regards,

Jeff

06/09/2011 17:47

Alison Jones

Joined: 06/02/2012

Posts: 11

Re: Shareable Reviews

Thank you, Jeff. We have done quite extensive coding at this point, and started a second review so that we could work with a sub-set of documents without the background clutter (with duplicates, included/excluded items, and complicated inclusion/exclusion criteria, keeping accurate counts has become a job in itself!).

Page 1 of 1