Hello Monali,
I just had a look at your comparisons and ran a 'Quick comparison report'. I didn't get the error message when I ran it but what you describe sounds like it might be a timing out issue. The number of items in your comparison (123) is not very many so that shouldn't be the cause of it. We are still looking into the issue to see if there is anything else that might have caused the error message.
I noticed that in your screening tool you have each inclusion/exclusion criteria set up as a separate question with a number of possible answers. There isn't a problem with doing it this way but it does mean that when you run a 'Quick report' that you will need to run a separate one for each question as the ‘Quick report’ only looks down one level of hierarchy. When you run the quick report, for the 'Select this code (set)' option you will need to select one of the questions in your coding tool.
If you wanted the 'Quick report' to run against all of the criteria in your screening tool you would need to have all of the criteria at the same level of hierarchy. This would require setting up your screening tool as a number of exclusion or inclusion codes.
For example, one of your criteria questions are 'Was the study done in North America or Europe or Australia or Japan or Korea'. Under that question you have possible responses of 'Yes', 'No' and 'Unclear'. If you were to set up that criteria as 'Exclude if not North America or Europe or ...' this would be one of the screeing codes and not the codes beneath it. If each of your criteria were set up this way you could then run a 'Quick report' that would cover all of your criteria in one report.
The program is flexible enough to work either way and the user is free to set up their codes as they please. I'm just suggesting this method as a way to have all screening codes in the same 'quick report'
Best regards,
Jeff