Hi there

We're encountering a bit of an issue with coding the abstracts for our study. Based on reading other threads here, I understand what the problem is, but I'm hoping you can offer a way for us to fix it so that some our of reviewers don't have to recode abstracts.

Some background: Before starting our review, we wanted to do a pilot to ensure all 5 coders were on the same page about what to include. Therefore I assigned the 18 pilot abstracts to each reviewer to be coded. However, we didn't realize that after they had been coded twice, they would be marked as 'complete' and the answers would begin to get mixed up between users. 

Our issue: Unfortunately it now seems that the responses of reviewers who coded first and second have been replaced by those who coded later. Is there anyway for us to go back and re-access the responses of our first and second reviewers? We need to see these responses to compare for the pilot coding. We really hope that they don't have to review the abstracts again for a second time. Please let me know what can be done to fix this issue.

Thanks,

Victoria