Hello Ella,

When you coded your items the codeset that you were using was probably set for 'single data entry'. This means that when you apply a code to an item, the coding will automatically get marked as 'complete'. 'Completed' coding is available to programs searching and reporting functions and is what everyone will see if they look at an item's coding.

This is the coding that the second reviewer is seeing (i.e. your coding). For the second reviewer not to see your coding you must do a couple of things. The first is to 'un-complete' your coding. This can be done either on an item-by-item basis (in the document details window) or in bulk (in the review statistics tab). Once the coding is 'uncomplete' you should then change your codeset to 'multiple data entry'. When a codeset is set for 'multiple data entry' applying a code to an item will not automatically mark the item as 'complete'. Under 'multiple data entry' the expectation is that more than one person will be applying codes to the same item and that the different coders will need to reconcile their disagreements before 'completing' the item's coding.

I would recommend having a look at two videos 'Screening part 1: single data entry' and 'Screening part 2: multiple data entry' that you can find on our YouTube channel (http://www.youtube.com/user/eppireviewer4). These videos will explain the coding process for both single and multiple data entry including how to 'complete' your agreements and 'reconcile and complete' your disagreements.

Best regards,

Jeff

Hello Ella,

I just had a quick look at your review and it appears that all of your coding is now set as 'incomplete'. I will assume you have figured out how change an items coding from 'complete' to 'incomplete'.

For the benefit of any other readers of this thread, marking an item's coding as 'incomplete' will not delete your work. It just means that the coding will not be available to the programs searching and reporting functions. If you also change the codeset to multiple data entry the other coder will not see your work.

I noticed that your allocation codeset is set for 'multiple data entry'. I would suggest changing that back to 'single data entry'. The only reason you should have a codeset set for 'multiple data entry' is if you are planning on 'double coding' using that codeset. The allocation codeset is just used for identifying the items that will make up you work allocations and is not used for double coding (whereas the screening codeset is used for double coding).

Best regards,

Jeff

Hello Ella,

At the present time it is not possible to have highlighted words in the abstract but this is a frequently requested feature. We have placed It high on our to-do list and we hope to have it available in the near future.

Best regards,

Jeff