Which MSc course did you take and what motivated you to choose it?

I completed the MSc in Social Policy and Social Research, specialising in systematic reviews. My decision to apply for the course was shaped by a strong desire to work at international organisations like UNESCO and contribute to policy and decision-making on a global scale.

What really stood out to me about this MSc course was its focus on impacting real-world policy and outcomes through rigorous evidence-based methods like systematic reviews. The course not only helped deepen my understanding of how to analyse social problems, but also to develop the analytical skills needed to inform policymaking in a credible way.

What did you find most helpful about the course? And what was most challenging?

One of the most helpful aspects of the course was its flexibility, particularly the ability to do the course fully online and asynchronously. This made it possible for me to balance my studies alongside my job in Japan and organise my learning around my professional commitments. That flexibility essentially enabled me to continue developing my research skills without stepping away from my career.

However, that same flexibility also presented challenges. As much of the learning was self-directed and online, there were limited opportunities for informal discussion with peers. I would have liked to engage more deeply with classmates in academic debate, exchange perspectives, and learn through those conversations.

What was the topic and method used for your dissertation and what was the dissertation experience like?

My dissertation examined the impact of information and communication technology (ICT) on reducing social isolation among older adults. I carried out a mixed-methods systematic review, integrating findings from quantitative and qualitative primary studies to understand whether ICT interventions are effective, how they work in practice, and how they are experienced in different contexts.

Overall, my dissertation experience was very positive. My supervisor, Professor Katy Sutcliffe, was highly supportive, understanding, and efficient, and provided detailed, constructive feedback throughout. She has helped me to develop my confidence and skills as a researcher.

What have you been doing since completing your MSc, and how has your MSc informed this?

Since completing my MSc, I have progressed into research roles at multiple UK universities, where I primarily conduct systematic reviews and evidence syntheses to inform policy and practice across different topics and disciplines. I am currently working on “what works” style systematic reviews, realist reviews and living systematic reviews.

My MSc played a central role in preparing me for this work. The programme provided rigorous training in systematic review methodology, which directly underpins all the work I now do—particularly in designing and conducting complex reviews, synthesising diverse forms of evidence, and critically appraising quantitative and qualitative research.

What advice would you give to future MSc students considering taking an MSc based at the EPPI Centre?

If you’re interested in systematic reviews for informing real-world decisions, doing an MSc at the EPPI Centre is a great place to start. The course equips you with skills on how to rigorously gather, evaluate, and synthesise evidence, which is an increasingly valuable skill across research and policy settings. You will get the chance to learn directly from academic professionals who are actively involved in producing evidence for policy and practice.

I would also strongly recommend getting involved in the voluntary research assistant scheme as an MSc student. It provides an excellent platform to gain hands-on experience across all stages of a systematic review, which helps to consolidate the theoretical aspects you learn on the course.